The risk can never be completely eliminated, however, by containing the volume of debris estimated in a 300 to 1000 year return period event, the risk of life loss due to a debris flow event has been greatly reduced. The new mapping now shows where it is safer to develop and where the risk remains higher.

This report shows that additional mitigation will be required on Fairmont Creek to further reduce the risk from a debris event. The next step for the RDEK will be to complete an analysis of the possible mitigation options. The timing of this options analysis will be dependent on the availability of appropriate funding and will include opportunities for community engagement.

There is no immediate impact at this time. For both developed or undeveloped parcels, when a building permit is required, RDEK staff will reference the new hazard mapping for both creeks to provide guidance on whether a report from a Qualified Profession (e.g. Engineer) must be submitted as part of the permit process. Determinations will continue to be made on a parcel specific basis based on the hazard rating of the parcel.

If policies as recommended by the Guidance Report are adopted in the future, it is anticipated that the new policies will provide guidance on how safe development is considered based on the hazard and risk associated with potential debris events. For example, a new Development Permit Area would provide clear direction on when reports from Qualified Professionals will be required by the RDEK rather than parcel specific determinations by a Building Inspector. The new policies will also assist in increasing awareness about the implications of the hazard rating under the current hazard and risk assessment levels for the community.

Following presentation of the Guidance Report to the Community, it will also be presented to the RDEK Board of Directors. Consideration will be given by RDEK staff and elected officials on when and how to implement the recommendations of the Report. It is expected that a phased approach that accommodates community priorities, available staff resources and opportunities for community engagement will be the path forward. Once more information is known on the next steps and associated timing it will be shared with the community.

There is no change to the annual requisition of taxes under the Fairmont Flood and Landslide Service Area Bylaw at this time.

Implementation of the recommendations in the Fairmont Creek report and the Guidance Report will require the future dedication of staff resources to explore options, conduct community engagement, and make application for alternate funding through Provincial and/or Federal funding programs. Decisions on the timing of implementation will be determined through priority project prioritization and direction to RDEK staff by the Board of Directors in 2026 and beyond.